Fix coverage data report

[mariomac]

Summary

Reported coverage numbers were way lower than real coverage, mainly because each shard of the test matrices shared the same code coverage flag.

Validation

• I have read and followed the contributing guidelines
• If this enhances / fixes / changes a core feature, I have updated the features documentation

[marctc]

LGTM

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 51.50%. Comparing base (9f48bf7) to head (ce80745).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1661      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   45.15%   51.50%   +6.34%     
==========================================
  Files         339      277      -62     
  Lines       37402    32326    -5076     
==========================================
- Hits        16890    16649     -241     
+ Misses      19441    14615    -4826     
+ Partials     1071     1062       -9     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration-test	?
integration-test-arm	?
integration-test-arm-shard-0	0.00% <ø> (?)
integration-test-arm-shard-1	0.00% <ø> (?)
integration-test-arm-shard-2	0.00% <ø> (?)
integration-test-arm-shard-3	0.00% <ø> (?)
integration-test-shard-0	0.00% <ø> (?)
integration-test-shard-1	0.00% <ø> (?)
integration-test-shard-2	0.00% <ø> (?)
integration-test-shard-3	0.00% <ø> (?)
integration-test-shard-4	21.20% <ø> (?)
integration-test-shard-5	0.00% <ø> (?)
integration-test-shard-6	0.00% <ø> (?)
integration-test-shard-7	0.00% <ø> (?)
integration-test-shard-8	0.00% <ø> (?)
integration-test-shard-9	21.25% <ø> (?)
integration-test-vm-x86_64-5.15.152	?
integration-test-vm-x86_64-5.15.152-shard-0	0.00% <ø> (?)
integration-test-vm-x86_64-5.15.152-shard-1	0.00% <ø> (?)
integration-test-vm-x86_64-5.15.152-shard-2	0.00% <ø> (?)
integration-test-vm-x86_64-5.15.152-shard-3	0.00% <ø> (?)
integration-test-vm-x86_64-6.10.6	?
integration-test-vm-x86_64-6.10.6-shard-0	0.00% <ø> (?)
integration-test-vm-x86_64-6.10.6-shard-1	0.00% <ø> (?)
integration-test-vm-x86_64-6.10.6-shard-2	0.00% <ø> (?)
integration-test-vm-x86_64-6.10.6-shard-3	0.00% <ø> (?)
k8s-integration-test	?
k8s-integration-test-shard-daemonset	0.00% <ø> (?)
k8s-integration-test-shard-daemonset_multi_node	0.00% <ø> (?)
k8s-integration-test-shard-daemonset_python	0.00% <ø> (?)
k8s-integration-test-shard-disable_informers	0.00% <ø> (?)
k8s-integration-test-shard-informer_cache	2.11% <ø> (?)
k8s-integration-test-shard-netolly	0.00% <ø> (?)
k8s-integration-test-shard-netolly_dropexternal	0.00% <ø> (?)
k8s-integration-test-shard-netolly_multizone	0.00% <ø> (?)
k8s-integration-test-shard-netolly_multizone_prom	0.00% <ø> (?)
k8s-integration-test-shard-netolly_promexport	0.00% <ø> (?)
k8s-integration-test-shard-netolly_tc_promexport	0.00% <ø> (?)
k8s-integration-test-shard-otel	0.00% <ø> (?)
k8s-integration-test-shard-owners	0.00% <ø> (?)
k8s-integration-test-shard-prom	0.00% <ø> (?)
k8s-integration-test-shard-restrict_local_node	0.00% <ø> (?)
oats-test	?
oats-test-shard-ai	0.00% <ø> (?)
oats-test-shard-http	0.00% <ø> (?)
oats-test-shard-kafka	0.00% <ø> (?)
oats-test-shard-memcached	0.00% <ø> (?)
oats-test-shard-mongo	0.00% <ø> (?)
oats-test-shard-redis	0.00% <ø> (?)
oats-test-shard-sql	0.00% <ø> (?)
unittests	?
unittests-shard-0	23.88% <ø> (?)
unittests-shard-1	13.32% <ø> (?)
unittests-shard-2	40.71% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[mariomac]

Setting do-not-merge label until I find the real reason for the low coverage, as the labels doesn't seem to be the reason.